Late-night rideshares have become a routine part of American nightlife. Whether leaving concerts, bars, restaurants, or evening shifts, millions of people rely on Uber and Lyft to get home safely after dark. But a new safety and legal analysis from Vaziri Law Group warns that the very hours when riders feel safest handing over the wheel are also when U.S. roads are statistically at their most dangerous.
By reviewing federal crash reports, California’s detailed time-of-day fatality data, and peer-reviewed rideshare safety research, the firm found that the narrow six-hour window between 9 p.m. and 3 a.m. consistently produces a disproportionate share of fatal roadway collisions nationwide.
And in many major cities, that six-hour period is exactly when rideshare activity is at its peak.
Nighttime Alcohol-Impaired Crashes Are Three Times More Likely
According to recent NHTSA crash reporting, 30% of drivers in fatal nighttime crashes were alcohol-impaired, compared to just 10% in daytime crashes. Nearly 70% of those nighttime deaths occurred on dark roads rather than well-lit environments.
California’s 2023 fatality records reinforce the timing: almost half of all alcohol-impaired fatal crashes occurred between 9 p.m. and 3 a.m., with the highest risk period arriving just after midnight on weekends.
This means that even when riders make the responsible decision to book a ride instead of driving themselves, they still enter a traffic environment where impaired drivers are significantly more prevalent.
Quieter Roads Don’t Mean Safer Roads
Many riders assume late-night driving is safer because streets appear emptier. But crash researchers point out that fewer cars often lead to higher speeds — and speed remains one of the strongest predictors of fatal injury outcomes.
In 2023, alcohol-related weekend crashes were notably higher than weekday incidents, particularly in nightlife districts and mixed-use urban corridors where pedestrians, cyclists, and rideshares frequently converge.
Fatigue Adds Another Hidden Risk
Alongside alcohol, fatigue significantly increases danger in the same late-night window.
Federal safety researchers estimate 600–700 deaths per year are linked to drowsy driving, with the highest risk levels between midnight and 6 a.m.
For rideshare drivers — many of whom work multiple jobs — late-night shifts often come after long daytime hours, meaning tired drivers are operating in the same high-risk window already dominated by speed, darkness, and impaired motorists.
Deadheading Means More Cars — Even Without Passengers
A field study cited in the firm’s review found that 40.8% of all rideshare miles are “deadheading” miles, driven without passengers onboard. When empty travel is factored in, real occupancy drops to 0.8 riders per mile.
In real-world nightlife districts, that means:
-
more rideshare cars circulating empty
-
more congestion on already narrow roads
-
more chances for conflict with impaired or speeding drivers
-
more exposure time for rideshare drivers themselves
Platforms may appear to reduce risk by removing impaired drivers from behind the wheel, but added vehicle volume at the most dangerous time of night can increase system-wide exposure.
Do Rideshares Reduce or Increase Risk Overall? Research Remains Split
Academic research has not reached a consensus.
A National Bureau of Economic Research study linked rideshare introduction to a 6.1% drop in alcohol-related deaths.
However, University of Chicago researchers identified a 3% increase in total fatalities, tied to increased vehicle miles and urban congestion.
Vaziri Law Group notes that for dense cities, real safety outcomes depend heavily on curbside design, pickup staging, enforcement, lighting, and how well cities manage their nighttime transportation ecosystems.
Legal Perspective: “This Isn’t Random — It’s Predictable Risk”
A spokesperson for Vaziri Law Group described the trend bluntly:
“When nearly half of all impaired fatalities fall between 9 p.m. and 3 a.m., and rideshare demand concentrates in those same hours, the danger isn’t accidental — it’s foreseeable.”
The firm says that in serious injury and wrongful-death litigation involving nighttime rideshares, they increasingly examine:
-
whether fatigue exposure was foreseeable
-
whether lighting and curb design created added risk
-
how much unnecessary deadheading occurred
-
whether city agencies managed clearly high-risk nightlife corridors
“Riders and drivers deserve reasonably safe transportation systems,” the statement continued.
“Courts are beginning to question whether platforms and municipalities adequately managed risks they clearly understood.”
Methodology
The analysis draws on:
-
2023 NHTSA crash data
-
California SafeTREC time-of-day fatality patterns
-
federal drowsy-driving statistics
-
peer-reviewed studies including Henao & Marshall rideshare VMT research
